6 ms·
This is incredible on so many fronts. 5-10 years ago, I would choose my computer based on it's potential to edit video. A decade ago, most laptops couldn't hand
by clean_send 4y ago
This is incredible on so many fronts. 5-10 years ago, I would choose my computer based on it's potential to edit video. A decade ago, most laptops couldn't handle the load of uncompressed video. 5 years ago, having iMovie on your Ipad allowed us to make sub <5 minute videos of low-res/processed files. Now we have an intersection of 1. an Ipad is powerful enough to handle this type of data processing and 2. BMD has found ways of dealing with the huge file sizes and rendering / editing in real time. Unreal. I imagined this would come some day but not today.
- simonh 4y agoWe're still getting used to how much things have changed in the M1+ era.
- bitL 4y agoHow is iPad going to handle RAW 8k video? Its highest storage is small, good only for a scratch disk at best or for very short movies.
- yieldcrv 4y agoI don't think it is the tool for the job
- dylan604 4y agoI don't think it is the tool for that job, but for footage acquired on the iPad it will do just fine thank you very much. The iPads are being used for shooting way more frequently than I'd have given credit, until I realize that if an iPad was available back when I was unable to afford other equipment, I'd have used the hell out of it too. We shot the shit out of VHS=>SVHS=>Hi8=>Digi8=>DV/MiniDV as if it were film. Now, there's image stabilization, light as a feather, prices are a fraction of prior so for the price of one thing you can get like 3 or 4, and then consider them crash cams, etc. Then when you get done shooting, there's 0 time wasted on transfering to your editor as your friggin camera is the editor and the color corrector. I mean, why the hell would you not do this if you're a broke ass college film student. hell, even elementary school kids could be doing this. it's mind boggling what kids have at their finger tips now.
- yieldcrv 4y agoI was talking about the specific thing I responded to. 8k RAW video on a device without the storage for it. But I'm sure there are proxies possible. You can likely find some out of touch people to proselytize to somewhere else on this thread.
- dylan604 4y agoAnd i was agreeing with you. The proselytizing as you call it was me being able to expand past the nonsense proposed and offered up a more compelling workflow. Sorry to offend thy sensitivities on expanding upon a conversation.
- thetinguy 4y agoExternal drives just like people using macbooks
- bitL 4y agoDoes iPadOS support them well though?
- scarface74 4y agoYes, you plug it in and it shows up in the Files app as another storage source along with iCloud and any third party service you have like OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive or you can store files locally in the iPad.
- Gigachad 4y agoSurprisingly yes. It used to be a limitation that apps would have to import the file on to local storage, edit, export back to external. But now extra APIs have been added and video editors can edit on external storage. The iPad has been sitting in this limbo state where they are way more powerful than most people expect but still not really worth it when you can get a MacBook for the same price and do more.
- simonh 4y agoWhen it does support it, probably very well. iPads could support editing and playing back multiple simultaneous 4K video streams long before desktop Macs could due to the huge bandwidth between cpu, memory and gpu of A series chips. M chips dialed that up to 11. As to your storage concerns USB-C iPads, apart from having up to 2TB of internal storage and up to 16 GB of memory, support external drives just as well as any laptop. The time when high end iPads had below low end desktop specs is long gone.
- mkaic 4y agoIf you have a camera that shoots RAW 8k video, I'd wager you aren't using an iPad to edit on.
- bitL 4y agoOK, iPad Pro has something like 4k-5k video camera, which produces a lot of RAW data anyway (assuming software can access RAW feed with some lossless compression applied), so the problem is still there unless you want to prepare videos with ugly artifacts from compression.
- Retric 4y agoiPad Pros can have 2TB onboard and hook up to external storage just fine. There isn’t much difference between that and the average laptop. That said 90% of users are probably going to be working with compressed 4k video because they don’t notice the difference and it saves time.
- diffeomorphism 4y agoDoes the 2TB model have any additional bells and whistles? The difference to the base model is 1300€, which is almost as much as just buying an "average laptop". The apple website does not mention anything, but that cannot be right. ? https://www.apple.com/de/shop/buy-ipad/ipad-pro/12,9%22-display-2tb-space-grau-wifi-cellular https://www.apple.com/de/shop/buy-ipad/ipad-pro/12,9%22-disp...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Gordonjcp 4y agoYes, but you might be using an iPad to take your rushes and throw together a quick assemble right there on set, "there that's how it'll look", and even import the timeline into your proper project.
- wil421 4y agoNot many people are going to care. I know a lot more people with 4k and lower short videos from iPhones/GoPros/Drones you name it. Being able to edit personal videos on the fly would be very nice.
- barkingcat 4y agoLumaFusion, aka the only way to edit professional video on iPad before this announcement, supports direct editing/ingestion and working directly on an external ssd. With USB-C and thunderbolt supported on the M1 ipads, the experience is basically, hook up your 4TB samsung external portal drive, and edit away. You don't need to copy the information onto the ipad itself. The export also goes to the external drive. If BMD did not support this fuction for Resolve, they will have a hard time competing against LumaFusion. However I think LumaFusion will be very carefully monitoring this market. It is theirs to lose.
- drcongo 4y agoLumaFusion is a fantastic app, but I do find it a bit fiddly to use sometimes - really precise edits are much harder than they should be. Looking forward to giving Resolve a go though.
- Vrondi 4y agoNow that mobile devices are getting this powerful, we need them to start supporting larger storage again.
- conductr 4y agoThey are expandable now up to 40Gb/s per tech specs
- Gigachad 4y agoThe iPad has options up to 2TB SSD and supports USB4 external storage along with 10Gbit ethernet.
- CobaltFire 4y agoThe tests I’ve seen say that (depending on how you implement it) an iPad Pro M1 only pulls 5Gbps (directly powering) to 7.7Gbps (powered) out of a 10GbE card. Has there been some development in this area?
- Gigachad 4y agoNot sure. But I'm sure 5Gbps is probably good enough for any work you'd be doing on an ipad.
- CobaltFire 4y agoI'd generally agree, with the caveat that running a video editing workflow off of a NAS/SAN would want all the speed it can get, which is 10GbE at this time on MacOS/iPad OS (AQC107 chip). So for copying files over it's bit slower, but for working with stuff it could be a pretty big issue. I really don't know; I haven't tried it as my iPad Pro is an earlier non-TB model.
- haldean 4y agoThe workflow many post-production studios use for editing/grading is to keep files on a NAS with proxies (i.e., lower-quality transcodes of the video clips in the edit) on a local disk -- that's the workflow I use even with my desktop machine, and I bet it'll work well with this too.
- regular 4y agoNobody should be shocked that it's computationally possible for a tablet to run this software. The question is why would you opt for that? This is on a tablet with no proper I/O, running an OS with no user-accessible file system. And, based on screen shots, this software presents essentially the same UI it does on the desktop... which is totally inappropriate (if not unusable) on a touchscreen with one's fingers. So now we have something that is profoundly gimped by the hardware, for which you have to buy MORE hardware (a Pencil). But the Pencil is only supported by the most expensive iPads. In the end, you're paying as much as (or more than) you would have for a MacBook Air; a real computer running a computer OS with proper I/O, keyboard, and high-quality video and audio output. It's only marginally bigger than an iPad Pro, and... get this... it has A HEADPHONE JACK, which the iPad Pro does not. All of that makes the MacBook Air a far better portable solution for Resolve than a tablet will ever be.
- Gordonjcp 4y ago20 years ago I was editing DV footage in Premiere 4 on an Pentium II 266MHz laptop, with a whopping 192MB of RAM. So, yeah, ten years ago they ought to have been able to cope with editing.
- imiric 4y agoYes, pretty incredible considering most of iPad's limitations are artificially imposed by the OS. If Apple would just allow it to be used as a general purpose PC, something they heavily market it as anyway, or gave us the ability to install macOS on it, we probably would've seen announcements like this sooner. The iPad hardware is quite capable, but it's a shame that it's restricted by the OS.
- raydiatian 4y agoNot many know this but the “walled garden” built around the Apple ecosystem is actually functional as a séance ring keeping the soul of Steve Jobs at peace so it doesn’t rise up from the grave to turn us all into fruitarians.
- jhasse 4y ago> A decade ago, most laptops couldn't handle the load of uncompressed video. I doubt this is true. In 2006 (so 16 years ago) I bought a mid-tier Windows laptop with a 80 GB IDE HDD and I was cutting uncompressed DV avi files on it in Adobe Premiere just fine. Real time preview and everything.