3 ms·
I hate this comparison because it implies that humans are somehow legally the equals of an AI algorithm. I don't think that's the case at all. For example, watc
by AlexandrB 4y ago
I hate this comparison because it implies that humans are somehow legally the equals of an AI algorithm. I don't think that's the case at all. For example, watching a movie or listening to a song has never been considered copyright infringement even thought on some level you're creating a copy of the copyrighted work in your head.
- Timwi 4y agoNobody would complain about an AI that does that, either. The problem isn't that the AI read some code and learnt from it. The problem is that it spits it back out, but without attribution. It's like listening to a song and then reproducing and publishing a strikingly similar version of it, but claiming that you wrote it on your own.