I think that there is a bit more nuance needed if you claim 100% legitimacy. Winning an election on one manifesto, being chosen by 100k members, and then rippi

I think that there is a bit more nuance needed if you claim 100% legitimacy. Winning an election on one manifesto, being chosen by 100k members, and then ripping the manifesto up and trying to implement a set of completely different policies would strike most, I think, as not 100% legitimate even if it's legal. And just to add that she campaigned with members on ripping up the manifesto.