3 ms·

Once again, you ignore the only question that matters in this thread. You also prove my own point: the press release under discussion was targeted at the U.S.,

Once again, you ignore the only question that matters in this thread. You also prove my own point: the press release under discussion was targeted at the U.S., as the default Newsroom is the one used for U.S. press releases. Unless you care to link to Apple's U.S. Newsroom? The one you linked is targeted at Singapore, as can be seen clearly. Apple customizes it to each region where there is a need to customize it. For the comparison to be misleading, we would need evidence that it is misleading at least in one country where they released this press release, and it isn't misleading in the US based on the evidence previously shown so far, as best I can tell. I had welcomed you to show some evidence as well, but you haven't. This whole discussion has been pointless.

ksec 4y ago
I didn't actually ignore anything until the first point is clear. You clearly have little understanding of how PR works. And the Apple US press release is exactly the same as everywhere else, inclusive but not limited to English speaking countries. The press release was world wide. And not a single word in there suggest anything being US specific, except you assume it was a US specific press release. And if this wasn't clear, in lot of countries, you are required by law to state it clearly if it was best selling Android Tablet in "US". >This whole discussion has been pointless. Yes. I do agree with this one thing.