4 ms·
The other way round. If he gets out of his limited role and engages into politics, it will be the end of monarchy.
by cm2187 4y ago
The other way round. If he gets out of his limited role and engages into politics, it will be the end of monarchy.
- nprateem 4y agoHe already has been for years. See the Black Spider memos he secretly sent to ministers, and all the secret carve-outs the Queen had. They have their grubby fingers in politics, but are just clever at hiding it.
- mpweiher 4y ago> all the secret carve-outs the Queen had Reference? Or details for ducking ourselves?
- xamolxix 4y ago> Reference? here are some references, though not sure if this was what GP was refering to. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/08/royals-vetted-more-than-1000-laws-via-queens-consent https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/08/royals-vette... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jul/14/queen-immunity-british-laws-private-property https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jul/14/queen-immuni... There are others, search for "royal consent" as apposed to "royal assent"
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Lio 4y agoNot necessarily the end of the monarchy. Parliament would just choose a new monarch as it did in 1688 when Charles II tried to choose an heir that Parliament didn't like. It's been settled via the civil war and the Glorious Revolution, power in the UK rest ultimately in the House of Commons not the monarchy.