2 ms·
I think the problem is less that they temporarily banned his account, it's more that the language of the message was completely false. There was no "careful rev
by nfriedly 4y ago
I think the problem is less that they temporarily banned his account, it's more that the language of the message was completely false. There was no "careful review", and it was not permanent.
Also, as others have pointed out, "suspension" implies that the interruption is temporary, so "permanently suspended" doesn't even make sense.
- themitigating 4y agoIf you wanted to suspend a user's account for a period of time you would say "suspended for two weeks". What if you wanted to suspend a user forever but it might have been a mistake or you might change your mind?
- nfriedly 4y agoI think that just "suspended" would be more appropriate than "permanently suspended". Although, it seems that the reality of the situation is closer to "your account is permanently banned unless you manage to raise enough fuss that an actual human looks at it."
- Zak 4y agoIt just reads like generic corporate speak to me. All corporate decisions are "careful" and adverse actions have names that sound milder than they are.