3 ms·

I guess I'm probably the only person in the world that prefers the look of no-AA...

• rottencupcakes 15y ago
  No, you're not alone. I've never liked the strange colored edge effects you get from normal AA. They're as annoying as jaggies. As an aside, the FXAA touted in this blog post looks washed out and generally terrible.
• zyb09 15y ago
  Most of the time, you loose the "crispness" of the final image with AA and everything tends to look a little bit blurry. Couple that with fact, that it drops the FPS by quite a bit and over time I got slowly conditioned against AA. However in some games it looks very good. WoW for example has a much better image quality with AA. Of course it also runs with 60 FPS pretty much everywhere.
• lmkg 15y ago
  As the author mentions, non-AA looks worse in motion. I could take it or leave it for static images, but when the location of an aliased boundary is moving, it tends to flicker as pixels around the edge make discrete jumps across the boundary. It addition to looking bad, I also find the extra activity distracting.