37 ms·
Back in the early 19th century when electricity was being studied by the pioneers of the domain, there wasn't any understanding what electricity even means; peo
by inglor_cz 4y ago
Back in the early 19th century when electricity was being studied by the pioneers of the domain, there wasn't any understanding what electricity even means; people like Ampere, Volta and Ohm were alive, but the units named after them weren't.
This didn't prevent the field into developing into what it is today, acquiring more knowledge along the way.
As of today, we measure intelligence using tests on paper. In the future, it might be done using something like MR or CT, only more sophisticated. We can certainly map some cognitive processes in ways like that already, so it does not seem as absurd as walking in 6000 Kelvin on a gassy surface.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- DoctorOW 4y agoRegardless of if it is or isn't possible in the future, until there's evidence all the NIH is doing is preventing people from spreading pseudoscientific claims. I've no problem with saying mislabeling a key statistic in a study isn't scientific, especially when that is provably the plan ahead of time.