3 ms·
"... Good news, but a lousy article, doesn't really add anything ..." Better than the exciting offerings from 'Barron Ernst Quicken Online Product Manager' and
by bootload 18y ago
"... Good news, but a lousy article, doesn't really add anything ..."
Better than the exciting offerings from 'Barron Ernst Quicken Online Product Manager' and his cheery marketing advice for using Quicken.
With 70% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck,
we want to help everyone make it to payday successfully
So which information source do you choose from?
The cheery marketing drivel from SoftCo or the cheesy articles that add a little bit of extra info but not much because the "cough" Journalist is lazy? The real bit that interested me was the article lists Quicken as free and the author compared a large company offering to some Startups (Mint, Geezeo, Buxfer, and Wesabe). Recognition from SoftCo. they have to respond?
The fact the url exposes its implementation says to me Quicken don't know or care about "Cool urls" ~ http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI nor understand this can be fixed using mod_rewrite ~ http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html The fact they use Java confirms this.