4 ms·
> "We have no other way of detecting except through the same effect we use to infer its existence" is true of everything in the universe No. For example, stay
by throwawaymaths 4y ago
> "We have no other way of detecting except through the same effect we use to infer its existence" is true of everything in the universe
No. For example, staying within astronomy, we detect gravitational waves and if we find an optical event that correlates with the gravitational waves, it is multimodal (we are at n=1), and if you don't solicit events (or if you statistically blind it by adding fake events in your solicitation) it's multimodal independent (currently n=0). Going outside of astro, you'll find very rich multimodal studies "I know what this molecule is because I have an IR, UV, NMR, Mass spec, etc etc etc"
- kotlin2 4y agoLight, in the GP’s example is also traceable back to a source. Observing an effect in a 3rd party isn’t directly attributable to anything without a plausible mechanism of action. Using light to detect stars as defense of dark matter isn’t a very strong argument.
- wumpus 4y agoI'm not sure what you're trying to say -- there are many astronomy multimodal studies.
- throwawaymaths 4y agoWe agree.