3 ms·

So the artwork itself is preserved, while it's annoying and expensive for the museum (arguably coming out of the oil companies' sponsorship budget). Sounds lik

So the artwork itself is preserved, while it's annoying and expensive for the museum (arguably coming out of the oil companies' sponsorship budget). Sounds like the mission was accomplished?

WaitWaitWha 4y ago
>Sounds like the mission was accomplished? Did it? Is the general public concentrating on the topics they intended on bringing to the forefront or that vandalized art? Is the general public's sentiment that their act makes sense, or that it was petulant, privileged behavior? In my opinion, they did harm to their cause.
- Nullabillity 4y ago
  That's not the question though. Is the museum going to think twice before taking more oil company sponsorships if this kind of stuff keeps happening?
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
anikom15 4y ago
That would be for the missionaries to decide. Regardless of the mission, it’s still vandalism.