4 ms·
Whats wrong with storing and delivering the intended content type as metadata, whether thats headers or filesystem metadata like in Mac OS X?
by semi 4y ago
Whats wrong with storing and delivering the intended content type as metadata, whether thats headers or filesystem metadata like in Mac OS X?
- ethbr0 4y agoTransmitting in-band (headers) seems ripe for arbitrary complexity. Someone out there would write a Turing-complete header DSL. And then someone else would write an incompatible alternative implementation. At least file extension is limited and externally visible (and thus accountable) to third party behavior, which should limit the worst complexity excesses. Is filesystem metadata actually different (theoretically) from extension? Or just data in a different format? Extension seems a nice balance between simplicity / brevity and utility, albeit as a hint, not a commandment.