> Paintings are the perfect example of lots of value and use close to zero of the planets resources to create. Okay, first of all I genuinely agree with this.

> Paintings are the perfect example of lots of value and use close to zero of the planets resources to create. Okay, first of all I genuinely agree with this. > They are experiences for many people that could last forever. These attacks are on public paintings. Absolutely agree again. But you still haven’t addressed my core argument: that climate change is an affront on the public’s ability to view art. Like I said: “what’s the point of art if you don’t have a habitable environment to view it in?” Hell, I’ve been saying this next one since 2013: “what’s the point of WAR if there’s no habitable environment to conduct it in or claim victory over afterward?” > This shows you care absolutely nothing about the environment and only about hurting people. How incredibly rude. > I have never seen him destroy things of large value. I guess $25M isn’t large value. https://youtu.be/DrhHCeRP03Q https://youtu.be/DrhHCeRP03Q > even if you think what he does is zero value Haha. Dude, I love me some Banksy. What?