I think the thesis is that positive consent of less-privacy leads to less-privacy for people who have less power of consent, possibly because the expectation of

I think the thesis is that positive consent of less-privacy leads to less-privacy for people who have less power of consent, possibly because the expectation of privacy is a social construct of the more powerful and influential. To respond to your thought-question about adoption of surv-tech in places where it isn't common: Taken outside a privacy context, in many small towns locking the doors to one's car or house is not a norm. I grew up that way. When I visited my big city cousins the emphasis on locking doors struck me as odd. If one lives in such fear then one has a larger problem than locking a door or not. Another privacy