So your contention is that it’s not a bad law. It’s just an unenforced law and therefore is still ineffective? As far as appealing to the majority, if the maj

So your contention is that it’s not a bad law. It’s just an unenforced law and therefore is still ineffective? As far as appealing to the majority, if the majority don’t like the consequences of a law, in a democratic society isn’t that prima facie a bad law unless the law is to protect the minority from the majority? If the websites complied with a law in a form that made web browsing worse and didn’t achieve its intended purpose - isn’t that yet another sign of a badly written law?