3 ms·
My only major complaint is that in the "images" section you see a lot of repeated images. I know that taking all the results and doing some kind of difference c
by Night_Thastus 4y ago
My only major complaint is that in the "images" section you see a lot of repeated images. I know that taking all the results and doing some kind of difference check on them/finding the highest quality version is not a simple or particularly computationally quick operation - but it would drastically improve the usefulness given the small size of the window.
- ryes 4y agoYes I agree, especially with wikipedia. But I was thinking sometimes people still want it in images so they can click and get directly to the image? What do you think about that case? If you have some more examples of queries where this is happening, that would help me improve things!
- Night_Thastus 4y agoActually this may be related to wikipedia as well. If I enter "voxel", the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th are all duplicates of the wikipedia image. The 2nd and 24th are copies of that doomguy image, but that's not nearly as severe. Looking over a couple other searches, it seems I was wrong - it really is mostly wikipedia cropping up in the "images" tab over and over.