4 ms·
Your own cite is to a productivity report from a single quarter, when the WFH wave is in its 11th quarter now. This feels like Wikipedia-lawyer disingenuous ci
by StevePerkins 4y ago
Your own cite is to a productivity report from a single quarter, when the WFH wave is in its 11th quarter now.
This feels like Wikipedia-lawyer disingenuous citation dueling. Nothing in this thread (or wider discussion writ large) is truly data driven in any scientific sense. Everyone is arguing their subjective view here, the only question is your self-awareness about it.
- kotlin2 4y agoI've removed that link to the BLS data as I agree it is erroneous to try to correlate that data to any broad trends in WFH / WFO. However, the Apollo Technical link is filled with misleading summaries and questionable sources.