3 ms·
In general I think extensions with functionality like this that require unfettered access reading and modifying every single page you visit are a huge security
by suumcuique 4y ago
In general I think extensions with functionality like this that require unfettered access reading and modifying every single page you visit are a huge security concern so having it be part of the browser itself makes sense. Same logic applies to ad- and tracker-blocking.
- Timja 4y agoThis touches on the topic of who writes it. Yes, it is nicer to have it written by a big player like Brave than by some guy from the internet. But why did Brave have to put it into their browser and did not publish it as a plugin?
- tredre3 4y ago> But why did Brave have to put it into their browser and did not publish it as a plugin? I don't know if they do that in this case, but one could assume having access to non-public internal APIs might improve filtering capabilities/performance. For example if brave was to implement manifest v3, it wouldn't impact their built-in ad/cookie blocking features.