I agree setting tax and spending policy through the preposition process is a bad idea, but saying “no way to change it” isn’t entirely correct, right? The legis

I agree setting tax and spending policy through the preposition process is a bad idea, but saying “no way to change it” isn’t entirely correct, right? The legislature can change it via a super majority and another prop could change it. It’s also not entirely budgeting by fiat. One of the cool things about this prop is portions of the spending don’t count against California constitutional spending limit (this prop effectively raises that limit so we can improve our infrastructure). I’m still on the fence about this prop. There seem to be good reasons to both vote it in and vote it down.