Images have much less of this problem. They are not the raw result of cognition. So changing images doesn't change someone's voice. Instead images are always in

Images have much less of this problem. They are not the raw result of cognition. So changing images doesn't change someone's voice. Instead images are always interprative. The camera doesn't capture what the eye sees. Often it takes a lot more interpretation than what a camera does to make a JPEG to end up with something like what the eye saw. In that process you can also change an image into something your eye would enjoy seeing. Alternatively you can lie and say 'this is what I saw' about something that is not even close. Once images are used to promote falsehoods, your worry becomes true. But much editing, either for accuracy or for beauty, has no such harmful effects.