3 ms·
It really depends on your demands; a lot of companies are running 1000s of trivial web applications and that’s it. Those can run on 10 year old servers which co
by tluyben2 4y ago
It really depends on your demands; a lot of companies are running 1000s of trivial web applications and that’s it. Those can run on 10 year old servers which cost nothing at all anymore and never break; I have a few racks of them (HP dl360). We have not had issues in our colo for those 10 years; I didn’t even replace a drive and these are mostly spinning.
Sure cloud is easier and if you need things that aws offers then go for it; we run well on a few $100/mo. Our most sold/popular product costs (I did this calc because of another ‘cloud is great’ HN post a few months back) less than $1/mo to host and maintain and has 50k+ active users.
I like and use aws but it makes no sense in many cases; I would rob myself running most of our products on it because they don’t require remotely anything that it offers. I think the ‘make a unicorn’ mindset messed up people’s bottom line understanding; making 10k-100k$ more profit seems pathetic to companies that raised 100m$. Thing is; that is real money and I definitely rather have dinner with my colleagues than send it to Amazon.