3 ms·
I'd argue it's the same thing. At the end of the day, keeping focus or not is a cost-benefit analysis. Put another way, focus isn't something to value in absol
by makeitdouble 4y ago
I'd argue it's the same thing. At the end of the day, keeping focus or not is a cost-benefit analysis.
Put another way, focus isn't something to value in absolute, it needs to make sense in business and opportunity perspectives. You say No to good ideas only if you're confident your current plan is good enough and worth pursuing on its own.
- glenstein 4y agoRight, I think that your interpretation here is basically correct. There's a lot of different words and ideas we can use to represent approaches to problem solving, and they're going to overlap a lot. And I think the exercise of treating them like they're mutually exclusive and "correcting" our choice of language by saying one term is more correct than another, more often than not, is just kind of tedious and beside the point. It's a good general rule of thumb for understanding any of these articles, and affording them what the philosopher Daniel Dennett referred to as the principle of charity. It's not to say that such corrections are never appropriate but that the principle of charity step should be completed before going into the exercise of attempting to correct language.