3 ms·
You said this "You learned that for 1000 experiments you observed something" So then yes, that is an agreement that at least to that statement. > But establis
by stale2002 4y ago
You said this "You learned that for 1000 experiments you observed something"
So then yes, that is an agreement that at least to that statement.
> But established nothing.
Well it established that at least you agree with that statement.
> Because I disagree with you.
actually you said this "I agreed to this:"
This is you saying that you agreed with the statement that followed that. So yes, you used the word agree.
- deltasevennine 4y agoYou're being pedantic. Obviously I agree with you something was learned. But I disagree with you that anything was proven or established by what was learned.
- stale2002 4y ago> I agree with you something was learned Ok, you agree with this then. Yes, that is my point. This is what you agreed with.
- deltasevennine 4y agoCaveat: I agree but I think your point is useless to the topic at hand.
- stale2002 4y agoOf course it is relevant to the topic. You are agreeing that at least something has been learned. That is a valuable point to make, in and of itself, that at least something has been learned.
- deltasevennine 4y agoNo. I'm saying what is learned is useless to the topic at hand. Useless to proving a point. Valuable,.depends on your opinion, useless to proving a point yes.