3 ms·
By that logic they skeptical of the VP role, CEO, Staff software engineer, more.
by danielmarkbruce 4y ago
By that logic they skeptical of the VP role, CEO, Staff software engineer, more.
- cbsmith 4y agoThey do seem to be pretty skeptical of the VP role as well. ;-) I wouldn't say that about CEO or Staff Software engineer role though.
- danielmarkbruce 4y agoThere will always be less VPs than others, less PMs than engineers, less CEOs than everything else. It doesn't say anything.
- cbsmith 4y ago<pedantic>That's not exactly correct. What is true is there will be fewer VPs than people they manage, fewer PMs than engineers, and fewer CEOs than almost everything else. ;-) </pedantic> Given that principle though, what do you think I meant by "When I look at the ratio between engineers and product managers, it seems they are skeptical about the role."? Do you really think I meant that since there are fewer product managers than engineers, I've concluded they're skeptical about the role?
- danielmarkbruce 4y agoThe statement suggests a belief there is some information in the ratio. Google tends toward about a dozen engineers per PM overall. It varies across the org depending on the product. Google is explicitly pro PM. The CEO was one. There is no information in the ratio.