4 ms·

no. Don't agree. Experimentation can't prove anything. It also doesn't strengthen anything. Proof is not a strengthening of something. If you prove something it

no. Don't agree. Experimentation can't prove anything. It also doesn't strengthen anything. Proof is not a strengthening of something. If you prove something it means it's true. >Well, the experimentation part, that can bring proof to strength a hypothesis, is something that you agreed to. >So that part would be shared, that you agreed to. Never agreed. You misinterpreted. I agreed to this: "we have actually learned something important from our thousand experiments". You learned that for 1000 experiments you observed something. That's it.

stale2002 4y ago
> You learned that for 1000 experiments you observed something Ok great, so then you agree that this is a principle that would be shared, which is the point.
- deltasevennine 4y ago
  Not great. Because I disagree with you. You learned something. But established nothing. You are no closer to proving your hypothesis.
  - stale2002 4y ago
    You said this "You learned that for 1000 experiments you observed something" So then yes, that is an agreement that at least to that statement. > But established nothing. Well it established that at least you agree with that statement. > Because I disagree with you. actually you said this "I agreed to this:" This is you saying that you agreed with the statement that followed that. So yes, you used the word agree.
    - deltasevennine 4y ago
      You're being pedantic. Obviously I agree with you something was learned. But I disagree with you that anything was proven or established by what was learned.
      - stale2002 4y ago
        > I agree with you something was learned Ok, you agree with this then. Yes, that is my point. This is what you agreed with.
        deltasevennine 4y ago
        Caveat: I agree but I think your point is useless to the topic at hand.
        stale2002 4y ago
        Of course it is relevant to the topic. You are agreeing that at least something has been learned. That is a valuable point to make, in and of itself, that at least something has been learned.
        deltasevennine 4y ago
        No. I'm saying what is learned is useless to the topic at hand. Useless to proving a point. Valuable,.depends on your opinion, useless to proving a point yes.

stale2002 4y ago

> You learned that for 1000 experiments you observed something Ok great, so then you agree that this is a principle that would be shared, which is the point.

deltasevennine 4y ago
Not great. Because I disagree with you. You learned something. But established nothing. You are no closer to proving your hypothesis.
- stale2002 4y ago
  You said this "You learned that for 1000 experiments you observed something" So then yes, that is an agreement that at least to that statement. > But established nothing. Well it established that at least you agree with that statement. > Because I disagree with you. actually you said this "I agreed to this:" This is you saying that you agreed with the statement that followed that. So yes, you used the word agree.
  - deltasevennine 4y ago
    You're being pedantic. Obviously I agree with you something was learned. But I disagree with you that anything was proven or established by what was learned.
    - stale2002 4y ago
      > I agree with you something was learned Ok, you agree with this then. Yes, that is my point. This is what you agreed with.
      - deltasevennine 4y ago
        Caveat: I agree but I think your point is useless to the topic at hand.
        stale2002 4y ago
        Of course it is relevant to the topic. You are agreeing that at least something has been learned. That is a valuable point to make, in and of itself, that at least something has been learned.
        deltasevennine 4y ago
        No. I'm saying what is learned is useless to the topic at hand. Useless to proving a point. Valuable,.depends on your opinion, useless to proving a point yes.