3 ms·I dont think so. It should not be named AT Protocol... :-( +++ ATHby mike256 4y agoI dont think so. It should not be named AT Protocol... :-( +++ ATHyjftsjthsd-h 4y agoDarn it, I initially assumed that this was about AT commands.rbanffy 4y agoSame here. I guess we are very old. OTOH, companies like these should hire us Elder Things to check whether they are naming something after something people like.xen2xen1 4y agoIt's not? Hayes compatible all the way!rbanffy 4y agoIt was terrible, but it was the best we had.