3 ms·

There are a few [Citation needed] in here from my point of view

• amadeuspagel 4y ago
  This is an isolated demand for rigor[1]. You didn't demand a citation for the claim that the media is corrupted by ads, and the implication that that's related to partisanship. [1]: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/14/beware-isolated-demands-for-rigor/ https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/14/beware-isolated-demand...
  • fcsp 4y ago
    > When media actually relied on ad revenue, it was not so partisans. Do you have a source for this? > Advertisers wanted bland stuff that appealed to everyone. Do you have a source for this? From my point of view a larger audience will drive the price up so I fail to see a correlation. Also, a broader audience leads to less targeted audience, so that seems cost-ineffiecient > It's the subscription model that drives partisanship. Do you have a source for this? > People want to pay to support stuff that they agree with. Do you have a source for this? You are framing a bouquet of personal opinions as facts here.
    • klipklop 4y ago
      >From my point of view a larger audience will drive the price up so I fail to see a correlation. Also, a broader audience leads to less targeted audience, so that seems cost-ineffiecient Do you have a source for this? I don’t see you posting any evidence “debunking” these claims. Just more of your own opinion. Pretty annoying double standard in arguing.