4 ms·
Isn't this literally just saying we need another layer of categorization on top of the categorization layer?
by ok_dad 4y ago
Isn't this literally just saying we need another layer of categorization on top of the categorization layer?
- all2 4y agoPerhaps "adjacent to" rather than "on top of"? I've started looking at this kind of problem in terms of DB queries or set relations. Even "organization" can be a set relation if there are the right bits of metadata in place.
- travisjungroth 4y agoIt’s saying you need support for multiple types of categories. You could use the same system to organize itself. No need for a meta layer.