4 ms·
There's a superbly written piece by Xianhang Zhang on Quora, that talks about the same concept. It's titled "Disregard Ideas, Acquire Assets" and presents a rea
by noelsequeira 15y ago
There's a superbly written piece by Xianhang Zhang on Quora, that talks about the same concept. It's titled "Disregard Ideas, Acquire Assets" and presents a really convincing case by citing examples of entrepreneurs that focused on building assets, until as he puts it "they couldn't not do a startup with them". (Leverage could qualify as one of the more important ones, or if you want to look at it another way, acquiring substantial assets equates to earning leverage).
http://www.quora.com/Xianhang-Zhang/Disregard-ideas-acquire-assets http://www.quora.com/Xianhang-Zhang/Disregard-ideas-acquire-...
This notion runs contrary to the standard approach that most early stage entrepreneurs adopt, namely the "build a laundry list of ideas and filter the top ones out using a combination of a heuristic, common sense and (eventually) customer validation and keep at it until you have traction with a concept that matters" approach.
I'm going to stick my neck out here, and recommend the approach that Zhang proposes - "focus relentlessly on acquiring interesting assets and then execute on the startups that naturally fall out of them". This means you might be pursuing something for the longest time that doesn't remotely resemble a startup. I'd qualify this with one caveat - make sure whatever it is, it's something you love doing.
And I think this is an interesting way to go about becoming an entrepreneur. Maybe you shouldn't dive in the deep end straight away (if you haven't built sufficient leverage / assets). Maybe that's another way deferring gratification, what with how cool just 'being an entrepreneur' has recently become.
- hndl 15y agoThanks for sharing Zhang's piece. That's the kind of simplistic (yet crucial) thinking that we almost always tend to overlook.
- bdr 15y agoFYI "simplistic" is pejorative
- chollida1 15y agosimplistic can be pejorative, but in this case it doesn't seem to be, atleast from my perspective > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pejorative http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pejorative > A term can be regarded as pejorative in some social groups but not in others, e.g., hacker is a term used for computer criminals as well as quick and clever computer experts.
- chollida1 15y agodownvotes? For providing a factual statement that the word simplistic isn't always perjorative?
- bdr 15y agoWell, I didn't downvote you, but I feel like I should reply... Your comment was essentially of the form "Some Xs are Ys, Z is an X, therefore Z is a Y", which is of course wrong. "Simplistic" is not one of those words whose pejorativeness depends on context.
- chollida1 15y agoThanks for the response. I disagree though:) Simplistic doesn't have to have a negative connotation. Infact the word simplistic can have, and very often does, a very positive connotation. Perhaps I'm just getting the definition of pejorative wrong?
- bdr 15y agoThe dictionary's on my side, but maybe usage is changing.
- hndl 15y agoI agree.