> Really, cars are not even close being the main culprit in terms of carbon emissions globally speaking There are a lot of contributors, so you have to tackle

> Really, cars are not even close being the main culprit in terms of carbon emissions globally speaking There are a lot of contributors, so you have to tackle a lot of them. Transport is one of the biggies. > And at this time we should think if it wouldn't be cheaper and more realistic to invest in mitigation for a slightly warmer climate. I despair that this idea keeps coming up, even on forums such as this. It's not like this is an original idea. There have been a bunch of studies that blow this concept out of the water. It's far more expensive to deal with the results of climate change than to avert it. There's also the huge human cost of not dealing with it, and the issue that you don't fix something by kicking the can down the road. The problem is only going to get worse the longer you leave it. It's like dealing with your house being on fire by taking your jacket off.