3 ms·
It’s efficient because it beats kqueue while reporting events accurately. A proper benchmarking program is in the works, however manual testing does show only
by e-dant 4y ago
It’s efficient because it beats kqueue while reporting events accurately.
A proper benchmarking program is in the works, however manual testing does show only minimal resource usage.
For more, see this issue: https://github.com/e-dant/watcher/issues/10 https://github.com/e-dant/watcher/issues/10
- mikulas_florek 4y agoI only mentioned Win32. There this library is very inefficient compared to ReadDirectoryChangesW, which consumes no CPU times when nothing changes.