> boys being more likely to turn an assignment in late Sure, but that runs against the popular narrative of "no biological differences". If we accept that boy

> boys being more likely to turn an assignment in late Sure, but that runs against the popular narrative of "no biological differences". If we accept that boys are more likely to "x", we have to also accept that _girls_ are more likely (or less likely to) "y", which opens all sorts of pandora's boxes. They're looking for an explanation that discounts biology.