4 ms·
If you need fresh ears/someone to practice on - I'm all yours. I'm not ready to discuss usage on desktop - in my opinion it even more useless than Linux, but on
by CoolCold 4y ago
If you need fresh ears/someone to practice on - I'm all yours. I'm not ready to discuss usage on desktop - in my opinion it even more useless than Linux, but on server side, for web services related projects I'm fine.
My upper limit would be ~ 5000 servers in use, 3-500 web related developers for that system/servers.
- deltarholamda 4y agoI would say that you can look at poudriere and jails then. You can tweak your many systems for optimal performance and have a build environment plus update system to keep them all running all on your own infrastructure, and roll out updates as required. Jails are fantastic for segregation of services. Linux has comparable things, but I've always been more comfortable in the jail environment. It just makes more sense to me. FreeBSD is much more of a Unix-y way of doing things, and if that's the kind of thing you prefer, it's excellent. I'm not a systemd hater in particular, but I do prefer Ye Olde Wayes.
- CoolCold 4y agoI'm not sure what is evangelical here using FreeBSD in your reply, can you highlight? If its tweaking, then im trying to remember any kind of tweaking of the system beyond sysctls that I'd practically need ..cannot much. Jails probably OK, but as you mentioned it's nothing unique like it was till 2006.. I don't see your selling point.