3 ms·
That's not true. There are projects which are not maintained by RH. Also, anybody could have registered that name before RH... You could have done so.
by markkrj 4y ago
That's not true. There are projects which are not maintained by RH. Also, anybody could have registered that name before RH... You could have done so.
- encryptluks2 4y agoThat is if GitHub doesn't let a big organization with a lot of money take it from you.
- jnardiello 4y agoMate, I've been working in this space for long enough to know exactly what I'm talking about. Podman, Buildah, Skopeo and Crun are ALL redhat projects. OSS = Open code (ok) + Open Governance (not ok). In the "containers" org there are currently 23 maintainers, 99% RedHat employees (with a few indies - you always want students contributing for free). This is a great example of enterprise OSS shitshow, whereas a large org register a fake org on github with an intended "open" name - but keep close control on the governance of projects and tries to push (implicitly) its technological stack as a standard. Disclaimer: I fucking hate enterprise vendors.
- zoobab 4y agoNot to mention Openshift.