3 ms·
I agree that training is fair use. I don't agree that when the model spits out verbatim or near-identical copies of copyright code that somehow the copyright is
by kevincox 4y ago
I agree that training is fair use. I don't agree that when the model spits out verbatim or near-identical copies of copyright code that somehow the copyright is striped or that the usage of it is somehow fair use.
I believe that the vast majority of code that copilot produces is fine. But we have also seen clear examples of copyright violation.
The biggest problem is that it is basically impossible for the user to tell which is which.
- i_like_apis 4y agoI agree there, and I think most rational people would too. This whole website though and "investigation" is some sort of sensationalism that seems ultimately aimed at fair use training, which is very unfortunate. It seems like it involves an ego trip and popularity-chasing with targeting a megacorp as a means to that end.