> I believe the argument being made is that in _actual, real-world_ use of copilot, no copyright infringement happens. So it's not just about usefulness. How w

> I believe the argument being made is that in _actual, real-world_ use of copilot, no copyright infringement happens. So it's not just about usefulness. How would you know though? The burden of proof is on Copilot. Especially now that it has been shown to spit out copyrighted code.