3 ms·

R.I.P. Paul Krugman http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NmZmMzlmZjU4NDVlMmFlZWRlZDM4YjZiYmRmYjc4NDQ= http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NmZmMzlmZjU4NDVlMmFl

• DanielBMarkham 18y ago
  Seems like you're posting an informed and reasonable argument from a political site. This argument has a contrary opinion to those expressed in this thread. Burn the witch! I wonder if I could make money selling pre-lit virtual torches for the angry mob that is about to descend upon you? Seriously -- I'd like to see this discussed in a separate article. Very interesting stuff.
  • robg 18y ago
    That's not just any "political site". It's far right, especially now. Shoot, Buckley's son just resigned his column there because he had the audacity to support Obama. What would they have done to the father since, as a reasonable conservative, I can't see him endorsing Palin? The case against Krugman from those niches of the far right is almost entirely political. That link is a good example of the genre. This is better and back when NR had something worthwhile to say: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NmQ4MzY0NGVjODdmZmY2ZGQzMDAwZThmNTYyYzYxYjQ= http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NmQ4MzY0NGVjODdmZmY2ZGQ...
    • DanielBMarkham 18y ago
      E-gad, it's the "let's be perfectly clear" meme. Wonder where you got that one? I don't mind you characterization of the site as far right wing. I'd simply look at the facts, source if doubtful, and continue the discussion from there. Same as if it were far left wing.