Getty Images already handled this issue with graphics. Most of their catalog was scraped early on by AI art generators. 'Errbody knows this because the Getty Im

Getty Images already handled this issue with graphics. Most of their catalog was scraped early on by AI art generators. 'Errbody knows this because the Getty Images watermark appears in a lot of AI generated art. Getty Images, in turn, banned the sale of AI generated art because it is legally tainted. The same thing will happen to source code produced by AI code generators. Github itself, or some entrepreneur, will come up with a way to identify and flag projects containing AI generated code based on models constructed from open source projects, so that those derivative works will not inadvertently be incorporated into other software that is concerned with such a flag. (They probably will also come up with an NFT-based mechanism of some sort to allow open source project rights holders to authorize incorporation of their code into AI models such that derivative works containing those fragments would not be subject to flagging.) Hey YCombinator, give me $10M to make a billion dollar company that "lives at the intersection of" blockchain and open source. (Haha, No.)