3 ms·
> but you all were already mad anyway ... This seems to be the line of argumentation agreed upon by several waffling pro-GitHub posters. Many comments have som
by gjkqfc 4y ago
> but you all were already mad anyway ...
This seems to be the line of argumentation agreed upon by several waffling pro-GitHub posters. Many comments have some variation on that diversion from the issue.
> GitHub gets their own rights to your code.
This is preposterous and false. GitHub has the right to display the entire work, properly attributed and licensed, to others.
No new licenses are given, no dual-licensing takes place, no code-laundering is permitted.
- naikrovek 4y ago> No new licenses are given, no dual-licensing takes place, no code-laundering is permitted. I suggest you read the terms of service again. here, I'll link directly to the license grant: https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-terms-of-service#4-license-grant-to-us https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-t...
- BeefWellington 4y agoI suggest you take your own advice: This license does not grant GitHub the right to sell Your Content. It also does not grant GitHub the right to otherwise distribute or use Your Content outside of our provision of the Service, except that as part of the right to archive Your Content, GitHub may permit our partners to store and archive Your Content in public repositories in connection with the GitHub Arctic Code Vault and GitHub Archive Program.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]