> Why couldn’t Microsoft pro­duce any legal author­ity for its posi­tion? Absence of proof is not proof of absence. They don't owe anyone anything beyond what

> Why couldn’t Microsoft pro­duce any legal author­ity for its posi­tion? Absence of proof is not proof of absence. They don't owe anyone anything beyond what they agree to provide to users of Copilot via its license agreement or to GitHub users whose code it has used in accordance with that license agreement. Those agreements define what they owe. That's it. The only way those license agreements don't hold up in court is if they are somehow deemed invalid. I do not see Microsoft making that kind of mistake. This website is designed to get people angry, and that's all it is going to accomplish.