3 ms·
If someone had such a wrapper, I'd expect if it's globally available in $PATH then it'd have a more descriptive name, and if it's not in $PATH, then you'd likel
by underyx 4y ago
If someone had such a wrapper, I'd expect if it's globally available in $PATH then it'd have a more descriptive name, and if it's not in $PATH, then you'd likely run it as `python semgrep.py` or `./semgrep.py`. Does that sound right to you?
- neura 4y agoWhy not `semgrep-py`? Though, as I tried to type that, I typed semgrep.py twice. The dot name really seems like a file extension, though. I'm torn. Also, first time trying the tool and I love it!
- underyx 4y agoYeah, I don't really have a good reason, it just feels like the wrong call :/ Maybe it's that the dot makes it feel like 'variants' of 'semgrep' (even if for the wrong reason) but semgrep-py feels like an entirely distinct binary from semgrep or any other variants.