29 ms·
For malicious intents, yes. But, for legitimate reasons where you need to have an "rg" package with a completely different use case, owner namespaced packages m
by sedatk 4y ago
For malicious intents, yes. But, for legitimate reasons where you need to have an "rg" package with a completely different use case, owner namespaced packages might provide a uniform solution.
- burntsushi 4y agoAgain, I was only commenting on typo-squatting. Namespaces do absolutely nothing to mitigate the typo-squatting problem.
- sedatk 4y agoGot it. You're right.