3 ms·
This will probably be a corporate-circlejerc like GAIA-X again. The website is just bad at explaining what's going on. It reads like an academic paper and is no
by RamblingCTO 4y ago
This will probably be a corporate-circlejerc like GAIA-X again. The website is just bad at explaining what's going on. It reads like an academic paper and is not user friendly at all. Do you have any experience with that?
- jeroenhd 4y agoLooks like a bunch of cryptocurrency/blockchain people scooping up government funds: https://essif-lab.github.io/framework/docs/ssi-standards https://essif-lab.github.io/framework/docs/ssi-standards This could be the real start of web3, but I'm pessimistic about the way most of the homepage is talking about funding more than about the problem being solved. The rest reads like a whitepaper. Maybe blockchains are the right technology here (though I doubt it) but the people writing the documentation were the wrong people for the job.
- RamblingCTO 4y ago> Looks like a bunch of cryptocurrency/blockchain people scooping up government funds Which sounds like every EU funded project I know. That's the state of state-driven tech innovation here, very nice. Happy to pay taxes for that sh*t ...
- brabel 4y agoI agree the website is very bad, currently. Maybe this page has better resources: https://essif-lab.github.io/framework/docs/ssi-standards https://essif-lab.github.io/framework/docs/ssi-standards But there's quite a lot going on... the work on SSI is being coordinated by the W3C Working Group on VCs (Verifiable Credentials) and DIDs (Decentralized Identifiers). https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/ https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/ https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/ https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/ I don't know of any real-world usage yet, despite the fact that the specifications required for things to work and be used by real people already exist, and that there's a lot of DID methods (over 80 last I checked) registered, but as people have noted, most are based on blockchain (but not all... there's stuff like the peer, git, jwk DID methods that do not require blockchain)... but I have to say that, in this particular instance, blockchains may actually be a proper solution for a real problem (that of looking up public keys and metadata for entities/users in a distributed, highly-reliable manner). https://www.w3.org/TR/did-spec-registries/#did-methods https://www.w3.org/TR/did-spec-registries/#did-methods If you want to look for related stuff, look for things that users would need to have to use SSI, like DID wallets... Some random examples I found by quickly searching: https://www.abtwallet.io/en/ https://www.abtwallet.io/en/ https://www.didwallet.io/ https://www.didwallet.io/ https://igrant.io/ https://igrant.io/ https://www.dock.io/dock-wallet-app https://www.dock.io/dock-wallet-app https://identity.foundation/ion/ https://identity.foundation/ion/ The OpenID Connect Standard is being extended to support self-issued OIDC (SIOP) which allows OIDC to interact with SSI constructs: https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-self-issued-v2-1_0.html https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-self-issued-v2-1_0.h... So, yeah, there's a lot of stuff being created around SSI, but admitedly, almost nothing practical yet... Hence why I was hoping to find something where this work could be very helpful, like logging into Codeberg :)