> I've never seen free speech advocates use an example of any of these as examples of problematic censorship Just look at some of the exceptions to free speech

> I've never seen free speech advocates use an example of any of these as examples of problematic censorship Just look at some of the exceptions to free speech: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exce... * Incitement * False statements of fact * Obscenity * Fighting words * Threatening the president of the United States These are all grey areas that are constantly being tested and censored to varying degrees on multiple Social Media platforms. Trump was banned from Twitter because of “the risk of further incitement of violence” after Jan. 6. So it's very much at the crux of the issue on the debate whether or not Trump's speech on Twitter should have been protected by the platform or not, which is what really catalyzed Parler and Truth Social's branding in the market place as "pro- free speech".