4 ms·
The art of science could be described as making that which is elusive, obvious, and to doubt that which is obvious, as elusive.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y ago
The art of science could be described as making that which is elusive, obvious, and to doubt that which is obvious, as elusive.
- xkcd1963 4y agoIt probably doesn't help that I believe that social science is not a science.
- 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y agoNo, it probably doesn’t help - it could be a source of cognitive dissonance for you.
- xkcd1963 4y agoYou mean that I don't agree? Thanks sherlock.
- 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y agoNo, my dear watson - I mean that your disbelief in that particular sub-discipline of science may cause you a headache someday.
- xkcd1963 4y agoOr it causes societal damage already by people taking it too seriously. Like people used to believe that graphology was a serious thing and that using your left hand might cause brain damage. Those things got replaced by psychology