> Maybe most people were voting on this because they think it's right or wrong, not because it says anything new or interesting (I don't see that it does). The

> Maybe most people were voting on this because they think it's right or wrong, not because it says anything new or interesting (I don't see that it does). There's probably some truth in this, in respect of the voting. I certainly never expected it to have a brief stint top of the front page when I submitted it. As the author I'd like to hope it was an interesting read, but I'll absolutely agree if you're much familiar with the crypto space, it's not new information or a new set of arguments. That doesn't matter to me because for me, for the position I take on this industry, I think what's important is for more people to speak out against crypto, to challenge the hype around blockchain and not be afraid to say it's simply not delivering.