3 ms·
This is changing all the time due to the way it is reported, extrapolation, etc. But let's be extreme and pretend half are false. Of the half that are false, on
by BlargMcLarg 4y ago
This is changing all the time due to the way it is reported, extrapolation, etc. But let's be extreme and pretend half are false. Of the half that are false, only a portion has a narcissist false flagging. All the cases are man on woman.
Now I don't believe the number of false accussations is close to half (yet, anyway), but even if it were, ask yourself:
Would you want to ignore the half of true victims,
Would you utilize an aggressive method (e.g. Duluth model) or utilize a safer method, if you know one exists, and
Does any of this mean woman on man sexual misconduct should be downplayed?
Sure, the actual statistics matter once trade offs come into play. But people are already failing the basic litmus test of answering the questions above. And that's how the pendulum of grief swings on.
- PuppyTailWags 4y agoI'm not asking about hypotheticals. I want to know any actual studies or even attempts at studies. There's no point in speculating about pendulums or anything if there aren't basic numbers and population sizes to work with. If people are funding research to determine how often narcissists accuse falsely of sexual misconduct I'd be interested to know what percentage of sexual misconduct are false to begin with so I know how to contextualize the study.