2 ms·
Yes, because punching on an even smaller minority is a good way to make a point about how black people are treated /s instead of punching up to the majority. In
by PartiallyTyped 4y ago
Yes, because punching on an even smaller minority is a good way to make a point about how black people are treated /s instead of punching up to the majority. In fact, he cares so much about his community, that he is against affordable housing because of course he is a NIMBY [1].
The transgender people (not transgenders), do not claim they have suffered more than his community, that's a strawman. Let's ask black trans people how their community has treated them.
This is a disgusting degree of mental gymnastics to excuse outright reprehensible behaviour.
[1] https://reason.com/2022/02/10/dave-chappelle-is-a-nimby/ https://reason.com/2022/02/10/dave-chappelle-is-a-nimby/
- labrador 4y ago> punching on an even smaller minority I don't see it. He told some jokes. That's his job. > of course he is a NIMBY When you drag in issues not related to the discussion you might as well admit your main argument is weak
- PartiallyTyped 4y agoSo the person who claims to care about his own community doesn’t put his money where his mouth is, but gets to joke about a marginalised minority who in their overwhelmingly majority support racial equality (because they themselves are an oppressed minority and overwhelmingly liberal) in the name of defending his community (instead of attacking those who actually do the violence), and that is unrelated to his actions and behaviour because … ? Clear it up for me, how are his actions congruent with what he claims he does?