Hey, just read your comment. You seem to be using Scheme macros (try, async, list comprehensions, etc) to reproduce Python semantics in a Scheme syntax. That's

Hey, just read your comment. You seem to be using Scheme macros (try, async, list comprehensions, etc) to reproduce Python semantics in a Scheme syntax. That's one level on top of what we offer, i.e. I think it's very interesting, but as a library. Otherwise you're not writing Scheme anymore (your 'list' example looks good, but it's not Scheme). We actually chose not to implement list comprehensions in the infix syntax because our grammar is a hybrid to allow us to have multiple target languages. You can already see how choices at this level can be mutually exclusive: the Python import syntax is not the same as the JavaScript import syntax. Anyway, this is a vast space to explore, we just want to keep writing Scheme _with_ another language. Interesting, thank you.