It is all well and good until adversaries try attacking their AI chat bot. How will they decide what is actual human input and what is a result of artificial ca

It is all well and good until adversaries try attacking their AI chat bot. How will they decide what is actual human input and what is a result of artificial campaigns that want to push the AI one way or another? No doubt there will come a time when they'll have a human do the input filtering. In which case how is it different than any other political party? Also on a broader subject. The problem in modern representative democracies IMO is not nessasarily with people disagreeing on which principles should win(if we generalise enough), but the real problem is that often people actually elected: - are untrustworthy and all they want is enrich themselves and maintain power - have good intentions, but they lack the understanding and skill to govern effectively - are shills funded by interest groups, foreign enemies and/or competitors. As first principle they have to fulfil their masters wishes Those IMO are the most important issues plaguing all of our democracies more or less. I don't see how AI could help in fixing any of them.